Contribute

The views shared on The Mideast Peace Pulse are those of the author(s) and not those of Israel Policy Forum.

New Phone Number

Please note that IPF's phone number has changed. We can now be reached at 212-354-1812. 

We will not stand for this

Israel Policy Forum is shocked and appalled by the column published in the Atlanta Jewish Times by its owner and publisher Andrew Adler calling for Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu “to give the go-ahead for U.S.-based Mossad agents to take out a president deemed unfriendly to Israel in order for the current vice president to take his place, and forcefully dictate that the United States policy includes its helping the Jewish state obl

Amb. Daniel C. Kurtzer on 'Reviving the Peace Process' (TRANSCRIPT)

In an ideal world, if we were writing this up as a scenario we would say let’s put this all on hold, and everyone stays away happily and nothing changes for the worse, and we pick it up perhaps when everyone is stronger. But status quos are not status quos and people know that. They either get better – or more commonly – they actually get worse because they are left neglected. I fear that this status quo, over the next 10 or 11 months if there isn’t some very significant policy activity, will deteriorate into violence.

Tags

Nervous Anticipation

There is nervous anticipation in the air. Starting this evening, President Peres begins his festival of consultations during which he will try to identify the most promising prospect to form the next government. Both Likud and Kadima have stuck to their scripts, each claiming their right to the role. Lieberman, as we have noted, escaped the warm up act entirely and is arriving home this evening just in time for the main show. His lips were tight in Minsk, not letting on where he stands. And now he is savoring the effect that the dramatic unfolding of his support is sure to bring. His timing is exquisite; the whole country is waiting for Yvette.

The other major issue consuming Israelis is the fate of Gilad Shalit and the new decision to connect his release to the current ceasefire talks with Hamas. Amos Gilad, the highly professional IDF negotiator who has been dealing with Egypt on the arrangements, is furious that he has become a pawn in whatever game outgoing Prime Minister Ehud Olmert is playing. He was sent to Cairo numerous times over the last several weeks to finalize an Egyptian sponsored ceasefire that showed progress on the Shalit issue but kept it on a separate track. All of a sudden Gilad finds that Olmert changed lanes on him while he was speeding ahead in his negotiations, placing both Gilad and the state in a precarious situation.  By this afternoon, the security cabinet voted to endorse the new linkage as proposed by Olmert and now demands the release of Shalit before the border crossings to Gaza are opened. While this will undoubtedly be applauded by most Israelis, Gilad is fuming.  As he told Ben Caspit in Ma'ariv:

"I don't understand what it is that they're trying to do. To insult the Egyptians? We've already insulted them. It's madness. It's simply madness. Egypt has remained almost our last ally here. For what? After all, it's damaging to national security. Our very essence here is a choice between bad alternatives to worse ones and even worse ones. The Egyptians have shown extraordinary courage. They've given us maneuvering room, they're trying to mediate, they're investing efforts, they're showing goodwill of a kind they've never shown before."

 

Trackback URL: http://www.israelpolicyforum.org/trackback/896