Contribute

The views shared on The Mideast Peace Pulse are those of the author(s) and not those of Israel Policy Forum.

New Phone Number

Please note that IPF's phone number has changed. We can now be reached at 212-354-1812. 

We will not stand for this

Israel Policy Forum is shocked and appalled by the column published in the Atlanta Jewish Times by its owner and publisher Andrew Adler calling for Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu “to give the go-ahead for U.S.-based Mossad agents to take out a president deemed unfriendly to Israel in order for the current vice president to take his place, and forcefully dictate that the United States policy includes its helping the Jewish state obl

Amb. Daniel C. Kurtzer on 'Reviving the Peace Process' (TRANSCRIPT)

In an ideal world, if we were writing this up as a scenario we would say let’s put this all on hold, and everyone stays away happily and nothing changes for the worse, and we pick it up perhaps when everyone is stronger. But status quos are not status quos and people know that. They either get better – or more commonly – they actually get worse because they are left neglected. I fear that this status quo, over the next 10 or 11 months if there isn’t some very significant policy activity, will deteriorate into violence.

Tags

US attempts to assuage Palestinian concerns

Laura Rozen reported yesterday on a shift in the U.S. administration's statements on movements on the Israeli and Palestinian fronts toward renewing the peace process. She quotes Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Bill Burns as saying:

We seek to create the best possible circumstances for negotiations, working with the parties, working with key regional partners like Egypt and the Quartet. We do not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements; we consider the Israeli offer to restrain settlement activity to be a potentially important step, but it obviously falls short of the continuing road map obligation for a full settlement freeze. We seek to deepen international support for the Palestinian Authority’s impressive plan to build over the next couple years the institutions that a responsible Palestinian state requires. And we also seek progress toward peace between Israel and Syria, and Israel and Lebanon, as part of a broader peace among Israel and all of its neighbors.

This clarification came after Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stated that Israeli actions toward a settlement freeze were "unprecedented" and President Abbas's announcement that he would not seek reelection in January.

Rozen concludes that Burns's speech is an attempt to appeal to Palestinian concerns so as not to lose a peace partner.

The Obama administration now seems to be trying to desperately signal to Abbas that it is trying to give him more to work with -- and hoping it is not too late."Almost everything cited here shows a subtle but noticable shift back towards the Palestinian perspective," says the American Task Force for Palestine's Hussein Ibish.

Burns's statement was made on Monday, the same day that Netanyahu and Obama met in private for 70 minutes. Shimon Shiffer reported in Yedioth Ahronoth that Obama's aides explained that the meeting was low profile so as not to embarrass Abbas.

Obama wants to the help the PA chairman and not create the impression that he is coordinating steps against him with Netanyahu-said American administration figures.

A senior White House official said he hoped that the meeting would dispel the tension between the two. In private conversations, Netanyahu talked yesterday with satisfaction about what he thinks is the understanding that the US president displayed for the positions and willingness of the Israeli side to promote the chances of putting the negotiations with the Palestinians in motion.

Trackback URL: http://www.israelpolicyforum.org/trackback/3273